Map of Catalina Island Dive Sites and Locations
In the course of geotagging some old photos from Catalina Island, I realized it was simple to display the popular Catalina Island dive locations in Google Earth, Google Maps and Live Search Maps. So here they are. The map below is a small version of the Google Earth display, click on it to launch it in Google Earth and be able to zoom in much closer. You’ll need Google Earth installed on your computer for this to work. While it looks best in Google Earth, you can also view it in Google Maps and Live Search Maps, neither of which requires you to install any software to use.
![]() Map of Catalina Island Dive Sites in Google Earth, Google Maps, or Live Search Maps |
To see all of our photos keyworded with both “Catalina” and “Island” in Google Earth, click here: Catalina Island photos.
How To Geotag Your Photos
Recently I’ve had some correspondance with other photographers about geotagging, what it is and how I am using it. I was encouraged to put my remarks on my blog. While I do not pretend to be an expert, I am happy to share what I am doing — my workflow if you will. I’ll probably revise this post as I give the matter further thought.
GEOTAGGING DIGITAL PHOTOS is the process of tagging (i.e., merging, joining) digital photos with information about the location where they were taken. So, geotagging (v) is a process in which digital photos are modified. Geotagged (adj) describes a digital photograph as having location information embedded in it. Wikipedia has a good article about geotagging.
1. Digital Photos and Metadata. Digital photos exist as computer files. Two common file types (formats) are JPEG, TIFF, but there are many others. Many of these file formats store not only the image itself (the pixels) but also metadata about the image. Metadata means “data about data”. In this case, the primary data are the pixels in your digital image, and the metadata are other pieces of information the describe the photo or the circumstances under which it was taken. Some examples of metadata are the date and time at which the photo was recorded, the camera exposure settings, the camera brand and model, lens focal length and even the version of the camera’s firmware. These metadata are organized into a bundle and stored in the file header of your digital file. In other words, this stuff is in your TIFF, JPEG or raw file. It happens to be stored at the beginning of the file, before the pixels. Maintaining these metadata inside your digital photo file is, in theory, a good thing since this information then remains with its associated image. As long as you have the photo, the data about how, when and where it was taken are in your possession as well. Furthermore, if you make derivative copies of the digital file, such as a smaller version for display on the internet or a version to send to an editor at a magazine, the metadata are in that version of the image too. Ideally, the metadata stay with the photo wherever it goes. (Naturally there are exceptions to this which I won’t get into, but you get the idea.)
2. EXIF Metadata. An industry group (e.g., a group of computer geeks with decision making power) developed a standard, or group of widely accepted rules, for organizing these metadata. They named the standard EXIF. Each piece of information in this bundle of EXIF metadata is known as an “EXIF field”. For example, date, time, lens, camera model, shutter speed, etc. are all “EXIF fields”. So, when you hear mention of “the EXIF data”, or “EXIF header”, just know that this refers to the metadata describing when and how the photograph was taken. EXIF metadata are generally considered readonly in the sense that they should not be altered. Indeed, most image editing programs such as Photoshop will allow you to see what the EXIF fields are but do not allow you to alter the EXIF fields. This readonly restriction is really just an industry practice — there is no physical reason why the EXIF fields cannot be altered. Indeed, there are software programs out there that allow you to fiddle with and change the EXIF fields, such as time, date, camera model, etc., but I don’t have any experience with them. For the most part EXIF data are created at the moment the image is taken and there is no reason to change them later — with the exception of latitude, longitude and altitude.
It should be mentioned that there are some other bundles of metadata that may be found in the header of your digital photo and which can be viewed with image management and editing software. XMP and IPTC are two of them. XMP is a more recent standard that, in the long run, may prove to be more flexible and useful than EXIF which has some shortcomings. IPTC is another group of metadata fields, developed for press photographers to store descriptive information about their news photographs. IPTC is the place where you would enter a caption, keywords and copyright restrictions about the photo. While XMP and IPTC are important groups of metadata for digital photographers to understand, I will only be describing the EXIF metadata since that is where latitude and longitude fields are.
3. The Latitude, Longitude and Altitude Fields in the EXIF Metadata. There are three EXIF fields of interest for geocoding: latitude, longitude and altitude. While there are some recent cameras that support communication with GPS equipment in real time and fill these EXIF fields when the photograph is taken, most of us will find that these fields are empty or do not exist in the EXIF metadata of our photographs. Essentially this is because the camera is unaware of your latitude, longitude and altitude. Sure, the camera probably knows the date and time (you set these when you first get your camera) and it sure knows what lens is being used and what the shutter speed is. But in general, your camera does not know where you are. The EXIF standard includes fields (spaces) for latitude, longitude and altitude. But since the camera does not know your location when the photo is taken, these fields are left empty. Its up to you to fill them in later by geotagging the photo after it has been downloaded to your computer.
4. Recording GPS Data. There’s not much to say here. Simply purchase a GPS that supports tracking latitude/longitude to data files, then carry the GPS with you and make sure it is tracking your location while you while you shoot photos. I use the relatively small Garmin 60CSX model, which is capable of determining latitude, longitude and altitude to within about 20′. That is accurate enough for my purposes. I installed a 4GB micro-SD memory card in the Garmin 60CSX and set up the tracking options so that when I turn it on it automatically records latitude, longitude, altitude and time to a file on the memory card. There are various spatial and/or temporal intervals at which points on the track can be recorded; I have chosen 10-second intervals. (On one flight I made I chose a mode in which a location point was recorded to the track whenever the plane had travelled more than about 20 yds so it recorded many points during the flight. The result was a big GPS data file but very accurate geotagging later when the location data were stored in the photos.) On a recent 10-day trip, during which I had the unit recording about half of all daylight hours, I found that less than 1% of the 4GB micro-SD memory card was used to store tracking data. I have a few multi-week trips planned in 2009 and 2010, and this setup should record the GPS data for every moment of the trip with no trouble. I do find that I have to change batteries at least once a day if the unit is continuously operating, so rechargeable AA batteries are the way to go. The files that are created on the memory card are “GPX” files; GPX is simply a form of XML text file that geotagging programs understand. On my Garmin 60CSX, one file per day is created containing all the GPS tracking data for that day (even if I have turned the GPS on and off several times during the day). When I return from a photo outing, I can either connect the GPS to my computer and transfer the GPX files from the GPS to the computer, or I can remove the memory card from the GPS and plug the card into my computer and access the GPX files that way. Ultimately, I put all of them into the same folder on my computer, a growing pile of GPS files that just sit there until I need them for geotagging. Here are two examples of GPS tracks. You will need Google Earth installed to view these. The first is a trip around Vancouver Island. The second is a bike ride around UCSD in La Jolla. Note no photos are shown with these tracks, that will come later.
![]() |
![]() |
| Vancouver Island track (view in Google Earth, Google Maps or Live Search Maps) | UCSD bike ride track (view in Google Earth, Google Maps or Live Search Maps) |
5. Geotagging: Merging GPS Data Into Your Digital Photos. You have finished the shoot and you carried your GPS with you the whole time, tracking your location while you took photos. You are back in your office and its time to do the geotagging! This is the point in your workflow where latitude and longitude metadata are transferred from your GPS into the EXIF fields within your digital photos.
Everyone shooting digital photos understands that photos must be “downloaded” to one’s computer, right? Well, the same goes for the GPS data: you must download the data files from your GPS unit as well. The actual geotagging, where the photos and GPS data are combined, can occur at two points in the process: either while the images are being downloaded (i.e., copied) from your camera to the computer, or after all the files have been downloaded and are sitting on the computer in separate folders.
I use the latter approach, and here is how I do it. I use a nifty little program named GPicSync, available free from Google. I make no claim as to its performance, but I have found that it works well for me.
- Download the GPX tracking files (i.e., files with extension .gpx) from the GPS unit’s memory card to a folder on my computer. The Garmin 60CSX happens to make one GPX tracking file per day with names like 20080811.gpx; other GPS units may be different in this regard. I place all the GPX files in a single folder; mine happens to be named “c:/gpx” but you can put them wherever you wish.
- Download the files from my camera’s memory card(s) to another folder on my computer. Let’s say the folder is named “c:/pics”. The files produced by my camera are raw files, but they could just as well be JPGs.
- Launch GPicSync. I first specify the folder where the GPX files are located. I just point it at the entire group of GPX files and it figures out which ones it needs. Then I specify the folder where the digital photos are located. Lastly, I specify the “UTC Offset”. This is the number of hours between the location where the images were shot and Greenwich Mean Time. This is needed because my camera’s internal time zone is local to me, but the GPS records time using Greenwich Mean Time. If the photos were taken in my neck of the woods (Pacific Time Zone) then the appropriate difference is -7 hours, so I enter -7 for the UTC offset. Then I press “start”.
- What happens? GPicSync looks at the time at which each photo was taken, compares that to all possible GPS tracking points that it finds in the GPX tracking files and finds the closest match. In other words, it determines which GPS point was recorded closest in time to when the photo was taken. The latitude, longitude and altitude are extracted from that GPS point and inserted into the appropriate EXIF fields in the digital photo. Nothing else is altered (hopefully!) and the digital photo is written back to the computer disk. In essence all that is changed is three EXIF fields in the digital photo, all the other information including the image pixels themselves are unchanged. At least this is how it is supposed to work, and so far I have encountered no problems.
- I am now free to continue on with my workflow and raw files, converting them into JPEGs and preparing them for display on the web and delivery to clients. They are now geotagged so (again, hopefully) the software that I use to manage my photo collection, make JPEG versions for the web and high res TIFFs for clients ensures that the location information in the EXIF metadata is passed along from one generation of the photo to the next.
There are other software programs that can do this geotagging step. I chose GPicSync primarily because it supports tagging Canon raw files. In other words, it will go ahead and permanently alter the EXIF data (adding latitude, longitude, altitude) in my Canon raw files. This is a requirement for me, since I want as much metadata in the source image (my raw file) as possible. However, if you shoot JPEG then you have other options. Notably, I should mention a program named Downloader Pro, made by the developer of Breezebrowser Pro. I have been a longtime user of Breezebrowser and love it, it is perhaps the fastest and easiest image browsing program out there. When I set out to geotag my photos I planned to use Downloader Pro (a companian program to Breezebrowser Pro), but I soon found that it has a limitation that I cannot work around: it will not geotag Canon raw files (.cr2). I shoot exclusively raw files. I generate JPG and TIFF files from the raw files, but the “master” file is a raw file and the master file is the one I want geotagged. I emailed Chris Breeze (the maker of Breezebrowser and Downloader) about this and asked him why his program does not support geotagging Canon raw files. His reply was that by altering the EXIF header in the proprietary raw file one can damage the raw file, thereby making it unreadable by other software. (I understand that this is a risk, but since I can always save an unaltered copy of the raw file before it is tagged, I can work around that issue easily.) In any event, at the time of this writing Downloader Pro does not geotag Canon raw files, so I don’t use it. If and when that changes, I will immediately reconsider and probably start using Downloader Pro.
One further note on this step: consider backing up your original digital photos before proceeding with the geotagging. The geotagging that I describe alters the EXIF information in your digital photo. In the event that the geotagging software you are using has a flaw, it could corrupt the digital photo beyond repair. GPicSync, and probably most other geotagging programs, allows you to make a backup copy of each photo while the geotagging is being done, ensuring that you have a safe copy in case something bad happens to the altered copy. Needless to say, its probably a good idea to use this option if it is available, at least with shoots that are important.
6) Geo Data Flows To The Web. OK, you have geotagged your photos. Now what the heck do you do with them? Good question. I honestly don’t know all that is possible with the software that is out there. I use Expression Media to manage my collection of 22,000 images, most having 3-5 versions apiece, including keywording, cataloging, captioning, ranking, etc. Since Expression Media allows me to view the EXIF fields of my photos, I can check that the geotagging worked and that the correct latitude, longitude and altitude appear in the EXIF metadata. Great, but that is merely an exercise and does not really move me or my photos forward.
Importantly, I exploit the lat/long (latitude, longitude) data on my web site. Each photo in my collection has a corresponding record in a big database on my web server. The database has entries for location, species, keywords and a bunch of other database stuff. This database is created by Expression Media and then uploaded to the web server. This means that if Expression Media sees that an image has been geotagged, that lat/long information will flow from Expression Media to the web database. In other words, images that have been geotagged have lat/long entries in the database record, while images that have not been geotagged are missing entries lat/long entries in the database. When my website software (written by me using PHP and MySql) displays information about a geotagged image, it will notice the lat/long entry in the database and pass that information along to the display that the website visitor see. For instance, take a look at the summary information for this image of the Wave in southern Utah:
![]() |
| http://www.oceanlight.com/spotlight.php?img=20608 |
You will see not only the coordinates of the location where this image was shot, but a few links related to the coordinates and some small blue ball icons as well. What are those? Read on for the most interesting part of this whole process.
7) Geotagged Images In Google Earth. Google Earth is an amazing world visualization product from Google. At present it is available in a free version and a commercial version. I have only used the free version. I am sometimes blown away by what can be done with it. For starters, it allows one to visually fly around the world and then zoom in close, seeing Earth features from a birds eye view. That alone is pretty fun. But it gets better for photographers.
I should mention that if you do not have Google Earth installed on your computer, the discussion below will be merely academic. You won’t be able to check out the examples I mention without first installing Google Earth. Instead, click the “Google Maps” version of each link, but know that Google Maps is the lesser sibling to Google Earth when it comes to presenting geospatial stuff.
It is possible to generate Google Earth “overlays” that allow one to display almost anything in concert with Google Earth. These Google Earth overlays are similar in some ways to web pages that you view in a web browser but they are instead viewed in Google Earth, which is like a browser but for viewing the globe rather than text. For web visitors that have Google Earth installed on their computers, clicking on one of these Google Earth “overlay links” allows them to view things within Google Earth, usually in a meaningful spatial context. For instance, here are two overlays that together summarize the keepers we got in Tofino a few weeks ago. The first link presents the tracks, showing where we hiked (green), boated (purple) and flew (orange). The second link superimposes some photos above the sites where they were taken. Load both of these links in Google Earth:
![]() |
|
Tofino tracks (view in Google Earth, Google Maps or Live Search Maps) Tofino photos (view in Google Earth, Google Maps or Live Search Maps) |
One of most oft-mentioned examples of a “GeoBlog” — a blog that is customized for Google Earth — is that of noted primatologist Jane Goodall’s Gombe Chimp research group, which publishes a blog about their ongoing activities. The blog is “geo-enabled”, meaning that not only can it be viewed as a traditional web page but it can also be viewed in an enhanced form within Google Earth at the exact location where the research is being conducted in Africa. Look for the little blue ball icons on the blog, indicating Google Earth-enabled links.
I’ve done a similar thing with most of the major parts of my web site, including the blog and the individual images. For instance, most pages on my blog are now geo-enabled. Here’s an example of an individual post of mine that is geo-enabled. The first link below just shows the blog post, while the second link displays it in Google Earth at the proper location on Granville Island in Vancouver:
(Also, the entire blog is available as a “KML Feed”, meaning that it is a feed accessible by Google Earth. The KML 2.0 link for this is at the bottom right of the blog, under “Meta”.)
Each individual image of mine that is geotagged can be viewed in geospatial context in Google Earth, at the exact point on the globe where the photo was taken. The first of the two links below shows a detailed view of the photo on a boring web page, while the second link displays the image in Google Earth at the point in the Paria Vermillion Cliffs Wilderness where the Wave is situated and the photo was taken:
![]() |
|
http://www.oceanlight.com/spotlight.php?img=20608 (web page) http://www.oceanlight.com/20608.kml (view in Google Earth, Google Mapsor Live Search Maps) |
Lastly, you can view an entire collection of my images altogether in Google Earth. This was the hardest part for me to figure out, and required some geeky programming to get it right. But its now pretty powerful (at least I think so). In one fell swoop I can show you all of my images from, say, San Clemente Island, superimposed on the spots where they were taken. Or I can do this with all my blue whale images. Or those from the Galapagos, or Guadalupe Island. You get the idea. If you have Google Earth installed, check out these links and let me know what you think! Warning: each of these links displays dozens or hundreds of photos at once on Google Earth. You will need Google Earth installed to use these links.
![]() |
| San Clemente Island underwater photos on Google Earth (View in Google Earth, Google Maps or Live Search Maps) |
![]() |
| Galapagos Islands photos on Google Earth (View in Google Earth, Google Maps or Live Search Maps) |
![]() |
| Blue Whale photos on Google Earth (View in Google Earth, Google Maps or Live Search Maps) |
![]() |
| Guadalupe Island photos on Google Earth (View in Google Earth, Google Maps or Live Search Maps) |
Comments? Errors? Please let me know by email and I’ll try to amend this post. Thanks.
Totem Pole, British Columbia
We saw many totem poles in British Columbia. There are First People (Native American) communities throughout British Columbia, and the totem is one of their most visible and well-known cultural and artistic products. I should have taken a few more photos of them while we were there!
![]() |
| Totem pole. Capilano Suspension Bridge, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Image: 21162 Location: Capilano Suspension Bridge, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada View this Image in Google Earth! |
Photo of Mono Lake
A few photos from Mono Lake showing its famous tufa towers rising above its alkaline waters. The tufa towers are clustered in “groves” in several places around the lake. We checked out the South Grove. While we were walking around the edge of Mono Lake, we had low dense clouds of thousands of tiny alkali flies swarming over our feet, but only to a height of 6 inches or so, emitting a soft buzzing sound that moved around as they did. Its sounds strange but it was actually quite cool. The flies covered the ground so thickly in some places right at the edge of the water that the soil beneath them could barely be seen.
![]() |
| Tufa towers rise from Mono Lake. Tufa towers are formed when underwater springs rich in calcium mix with lakewater rich in carbonates, forming calcium carbonate (limestone) structures below the surface of the lake. The towers were eventually revealed when the water level in the lake was lowered starting in 1941. South tufa grove, Navy Beach. Mono Lake, California, USA. Image: 09929 Location: Mono Lake, California, USA View this Image in Google Earth! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Tufa towers rise from Mono Lake with the Eastern Sierra visible in the distance. Tufa towers are formed when underwater springs rich in calcium mix with lakewater rich in carbonates, forming calcium carbonate (limestone) structures below the surface of the lake. The towers were eventually revealed when the water level in the lake was lowered starting in 1941. South tufa grove, Navy Beach. Mono Lake, California, USA. Image: 09932 |
Tufa towers rise from Mono Lake. Tufa towers are formed when underwater springs rich in calcium mix with lakewater rich in carbonates, forming calcium carbonate (limestone) structures below the surface of the lake. The towers were eventually revealed when the water level in the lake was lowered starting in 1941. South tufa grove, Navy Beach. Mono Lake, California, USA. Image: 09928 |
Tufa towers rise from Mono Lake. Tufa towers are formed when underwater springs rich in calcium mix with lakewater rich in carbonates, forming calcium carbonate (limestone) structures below the surface of the lake. The towers were eventually revealed when the water level in the lake was lowered starting in 1941. South tufa grove, Navy Beach. Mono Lake, California, USA. Image: 09931 |
Keywords: Mono Lake, tufa towers, photo, saline, picture, brine shrimp, image, Lee Vining, photo
Capilano Suspension Bridge, Vancouver
The Capilano Suspension Bridge is just outside of Vancouver, British Columbia. It’s a fun outing, especially for kids. Be advised, however, that you should arrive early if you wish to walk the bridges and through the forested sides of Capilano Gorge in peace. For once the tour buses arrive — and arrive they will — the place becomes inundated with people and its appeal lessens considerably. We got there shortly after it opened and enjoyed it greatly for about an hour before we noticed the tour bus crowds arriving.
![]() |
| Capilano Suspension Bridge, 140 m (450 ft) long and hanging 70 m (230 ft) above the Capilano River. The two pre-stressed steel cables supporting the bridge are each capable of supporting 45,000 kgs and together can hold about 1300 people. Capilano Suspension Bridge, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Image: 21143 Location: Capilano Suspension Bridge, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada View this Image in Google Earth! |
![]() |
| Capilano Suspension Bridge, 140 m (450 ft) long and hanging 70 m (230 ft) above the Capilano River. The two pre-stressed steel cables supporting the bridge are each capable of supporting 45,000 kgs and together can hold about 1300 people. Capilano Suspension Bridge, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Image: 21144 Location: Capilano Suspension Bridge, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada View this Image in Google Earth! |
![]() |
| Capilano Suspension Bridge, 140 m (450 ft) long and hanging 70 m (230 ft) above the Capilano River. The two pre-stressed steel cables supporting the bridge are each capable of supporting 45,000 kgs and together can hold about 1300 people. Capilano Suspension Bridge, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Image: 21145 Location: Capilano Suspension Bridge, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada View this Image in Google Earth! |
![]() |
| Capilano Suspension Bridge, 140 m (450 ft) long and hanging 70 m (230 ft) above the Capilano River. The two pre-stressed steel cables supporting the bridge are each capable of supporting 45,000 kgs and together can hold about 1300 people. Capilano Suspension Bridge, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Image: 21147 Location: Capilano Suspension Bridge, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada View this Image in Google Earth! |
Lost Lake, Whistler, British Columbia
Whistler is plugged with mountain bike trails, like a huge web running through the woods. I made a few outings to Lost Lake and the trails around there, running one morning and biking with my kids the next. We would often see shadowy figures moving deep in the forest on either side of the logging road and would recognize them as mountain bikers rocketing along single-track trails deep in the trees. Here’s a spot on the side of Lost Lake that we stopped to admire the view.
![]() |
| Lost Lake. Whistler, British Columbia, Canada. Image: 21002 Location: Whistler, British Columbia, Canada View this Image in Google Earth! |
Ilanaaq on Whistler Mountain, British Columbia
While in Whistler, we saw a few unusual stone structures. One was at the top of the gondola station, near the patio overlooking Whistler Village. The other was larger and situated on a clearing on the summit of Whistler Mountain. After asking around, we learned that these were statues of Ilanaaq, the symbol of the Vancouver 2010 Olympic Winter Games, much of which will take place at Whistler.
![]() |
| Ilanaaq, the logo of the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver, is formed of stone in the Inukshuk-style of traditional Inuit sculpture. This one is located on the summit of Whistler Mountain. Whistler, British Columbia, Canada. Image: 21018 Location: Whistler, British Columbia, Canada View this Image in Google Earth! |
![]() |
| Ilanaaq, the logo of the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver, is formed of stone in the Inukshuk-style of traditional Inuit sculpture. Located near the Whistler mountain gondola station, overlooking Whistler Village and Green Lake in the distance. Whistler, British Columbia, Canada. Image: 21007 Location: Whistler, British Columbia, Canada View this Image in Google Earth! |
Green Lake Panorama, Whistler, British Columbia
The weather we experienced in Whistler in July was spectacular. Warm, sunny, with hardly a cloud in the sky. However, that lack of clouds made for some truly uninspiring landscape photography. I only found one image from our stay in Whistler that I was very happy with, and that is a panorama of Green Lake taken fairly early in the morning. The lake was glassed off and the float planes had not started flying yet, so it was dead quiet. Blackcomb Mountain is to the left, and Whistler Mountain is dead center.
![]() |
| Green Lake panorama. Whistler, British Columbia, Canada. Image: 21006 Location: Whistler, British Columbia, Canada View this Image in Google Earth!Pano dimensions: 3098 x 17550 |
Granville Island Public Market, Vancouver
While in Vancouver we spent a few days on Granville Island. The collection of shops, marinas, parks and pubs there makes walking around the small island really enjoyable, and the views across to downtown Vancouver are great. We particularly liked the Granville Island Public Market, a conglomeration of grocers, fruit sellers, chocolatiers, artists, butchers, bakers and candlestick makers housed in a large airy warehouse-like marketplace fronting the harbor. We bought bags of Rainier cherries and chowed down on them while strolling through the aisles and looking over the gastronomic delights.
![]() |
| Fresh salmon on ice at the Public Market, Granville Island, Vancouver. Granville Island, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Image: 21200 Location: Granville Island, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada View this Image in Google Earth! |
![]() |
| Public Market, Granville Island, Vancouver. Granville Island, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Image: 21198 Location: Granville Island, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada View this Image in Google Earth! |
![]() |
| Sausages and bratwurst variety, Public Market, Granville Island, Vancouver. Granville Island, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Image: 21201 Location: Granville Island, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada View this Image in Google Earth! |
![]() |
| Crowds enjoy the food and offerings at the Public Market, Granville Island, Vancouver. Granville Island, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Image: 21210 Location: Granville Island, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada View this Image in Google Earth! |
Zeiss Ikon Contarex Bullseye Camera and Lenses for Sale
Sorry folks, my Carl Zeiss Ikon Contarex Bullseye is now SOLD! Read on anyway if you wish…
I am selling my beautiful Carl Zeiss Ikon Contarex 35mm single lens reflex film camera and its three Zeiss lenses. This is the first model of the Zeiss Ikon Contarex line of 35mm cameras, affectionately known as the Contarex Bullseye (in the U.S.) or the Contarex Cyclops (in the U.K.) for the selenium meter cell positioned above the lens. Indeed, this meter requires no batteries and remains sensitive to light even now, although I am in the habit of using a handheld light meter so I shoot this camera in manual mode according to my light meter’s reading. (I have not calibrated the meter and even if I found it reasonably accurate I would use a modern light meter anyway.) Having no major scratches, dents or marks on the camera or lenses, this gear is in excellent condition. It is a marvel of German engineering and a beauty to behold. The Contarex Bullseye was produced from 1959 to 1966. It was the Contarex cameras among others that helped make the name “Carl Zeiss” synonymous with quality and engineering perfection. The Contarex line of 35mm cameras are serious collector’s items, some of the most well-regarded and sought-after photography gear today. The mechanisms and optics in the Contarex line were the second to none when they were produced in the 1960’s — these cameras were the absolute finest available and were the choice of working pros when they were in production, and they continued in service for many pros and serious amateurs into the 1970’s. The Contarex optics remain some of the finest ever made for 35mm cameras, but that is no surprise as they are Carl Zeiss-designed and manufactered. The focus rings on these lenses are remarkably smooth with just the right amount of resistance. This camera is made of machined metal and is solid, heavy baby! It is composed of over 1100 individual parts. I have been using this camera lately and I have observed no evidence of mechanical problems. As I mentioned I would not trust the light meter, but it is light sensitive so it has some life in it yet. It operates well and the photos are sharp. OK, that’s probably enough glowing description. Truthfully, if you aren’t familiar with the Contarex Bullseye and its place in the history of 35mm photography then you probably are not a serious buyer. If you are familiar with the Contarex Bullseye then you are probably a serious film photographer, a photography historian, a camera collector or some combination of the three, and therefore there is not much that I can say here that you don’t already know.
The particular camera bears serial number T91200, indicating it was built in Dresden, Germany between September 1959 and November 1960 and is known in the collecting community as a “Contarex A”, of which there were only 10,000 built (there were also “B”, “D”, “E” and “G” models built in later years). Around 1959 the Contarex Bullseye sold for about DM 1300 (adjusted for inflation and exchange rates this is a small fortune today). The camera has shutter speeds from 1 second through to 1/1000 sec, plus bulb and a self-timer. Aperture control from 1.4 through 22.
I am providing lots of clear photos of this gear, the three big ones shown here plus a set of 45 photos via a link near the bottom of this note.
The Zeiss Contarex Bullseye with Zeiss Planar 50mm f/2 lens (the standard lens, one of three that are included) I am selling:

The same Zeiss Contarex Bullseye with Distagon 35mm f/4 lens (mounted), Zeiss Planar 50mm f/2 lens (left), Zeiss Sonnar 135mm f/4 lens (right). There is some discoloration on the Sonnar’s lens hood but the lens itself is very clean and nice. I will not use any cleaner on the lens hood to avoid risking damaging the finish:

Check it out! This is the inside cover page from one of the original Zeiss Contarex Bullseye manuals I am including. She looks like a cross between one of the “Bond girls” and one of the original showcase models from “The Price is Right”. Dig it baby:

The following are included in this offering. I believe all pieces are original except perhaps the cable release.
Zeiss Ikon Contarex “Bullseye” camera. Meter is light sensitive but has not been tested for accuracy. S/N T91200.
Zeiss Planar 50mm f/2 lens with front cap, S/N 2376976.
Zeiss Distagon 35mm f/4 lens with front cap, back cap and storage container, S/N 3257821.
Zeiss Sonnar 135mm f/4 lens with front lens shade, front cap, back cap and storage container, S/N 3268270.
Zeiss Proxar 0.35mm screw-on closeup lens (for use on the Sonnar 135mm lens) with case and box.
Zeiss B56 Skylight filter with case and box.
Cable release (threads into shutter release button).
Manual: Zeiss Ikon Contarex lens tables, 16 pages.
Manual: Zeiss Ikon Contarex “Instructions for Use”, 52 pages.
Manual: “Contarex Guide: How to Use The Contarex and Contarex Special Single Lens Reflex Cameras” by W.D. Emanuel, 1960, 96 pages.
Manual: Zeiss Ikon Contarex product description brochure, 16 pages.
Manual: “Contarex, Contarex Special Cameras and Accessories”, 1961, 16 pages.
Original leather case and strap, interior is in good shape with one small area showing wear through the felt, exterior is in good shape but does show some wear, snaps function perfectly and the strap is sound but shows some wear. This is one really well built case! The shorter lenses (e.g., 35mm, 50mm) can be left mounted on the camera when stored in this case.
I plan to occasionally shoot this camera until it is sold. I am principally a digital photographer but there are some fun things to do with color and b/w negative films that cannot be duplicated with digital yet.
Camera is sold as-is. I am selling the entire set; I will not consider piecing it out as I do not want to get into repeated negotiations and I am not a collector (I do not wish to be left with any of these items in the long term). Please don’t send me any lowball offers — I will not respond. Buyer pays shipping and insurance. Any check must be drawn on a U.S. bank with a presence in San Diego where I can cash the check. Wire transfer, cash by FEDEX, and international money orders are accepted. Western Union and offers from Africa are not accepted. Paypal will be accepted only by prior agreement.
British Columbia Parliament Buildings, Victoria, Vancouver Island
Facing Victoria’s famous and scenic Inner Harbour are the British Columbia Parliament Buildings. Built in 1893, the buildings are home to the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia.
![]() |
| The British Columbia Parliament Buildings are located in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada and serve as the seat of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia. The main block of the Parliament Buildings combines Baroque details with Romanesque Revival rustication. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. Image: 21048 Location: Victoria, British Columbia, Canada View this Image in Google Earth! |
HOME | Online Image Search | Photo of the Day | Contact / Bio | Licensing/Pricing | Prints | Stock List | Image Hierarchy | List of Log Entries | Site Map | Blue Whale | Cetaceans | Pinnipeds | Sharks | Rays | Fishes | Kelp Forest | Sea Birds | Inverts | Man & Animal | Man & Ocean | Ocean & Light | Ocean & Motion | Portraits | About Color and Monitor Calibration | Copyright Statement | All text and photographs copyright © Phillip Colla Natural History Photography All rights reserved worldwide. The content of this site is made available for purposes of researching images offered for license by Phillip Colla Natural History Photography. No image is to be copied, duplicated, modified or redistributed in whole or part without the prior written permission of Phillip Colla Natural History Photography. Whale logo is a trademark of Phillip Colla Natural History Photography, 8021 Paseo Arrayan, Carlsbad, CA 92009, USA. 760.707.7153 Email: oceanlight@OceanLight.com Web: www.OceanLight.com Portfolios: www.Gygis.com
Updated: May 22, 2013












































